Just because someone considers himself or herself a dental specialist does not make that person an expert witness. What is true regarding this statement?

The assertion that someone identifying as a dental specialist does not automatically qualify them as an expert witness is accurate, and thus the first statement is true. It highlights the distinction between having specialized training and being able to provide expert testimony in a legal context. Not every specialist has the necessary experience or articulation skills required to function effectively as an expert witness in court.

For the second part of the statement, it is equally true that perceiving oneself as a specialist does not confer expertise in legal matters or in providing testimony. An expert witness must not only have specialized knowledge but also the ability to communicate that knowledge effectively to the court and must be recognized as such by the court based on their qualifications, experience, and relevance to the case at hand.

The combination of these two true statements makes the answer accurate, indicating a sound understanding of the distinctions between dental specialization and the role of an expert witness in legal proceedings.