Which statement regarding partial caries removal and indirect pulp capping is true?

The correct statement regarding partial caries removal and indirect pulp capping is that partial removal is acceptable if the restoration is well sealed.

This concept is grounded in the principles of carious tooth management, particularly in cases where there is a risk of pulp exposure. When partial caries removal is performed, the goal is to retain some affected dentin that is close to the pulp but not necessarily infected, thereby allowing for the possibility of pulp healing and minimizing the risk of pulpitis. However, this procedure requires that a well-sealed restoration is placed over the area to protect the pulpal tissue and prevent bacteria from re-entering the cavity, which could compromise the tooth's health and increase the likelihood of further decay or pulp damage. A properly sealed restoration creates a barrier that promotes healing and reduces the risk of complications.

In contrast, the other statements are less accurate. Partial removal of carious dentin does impact the risk of pulp exposure, but a skilled practitioner typically assesses the situation to manage that risk effectively. While concerns about pulpitis are valid, the practice of indirect pulp capping is based on evidence suggesting that, when done correctly, it should not increase incidence rates. Additionally, restoration longevity is influenced by various factors, and while compromised sealants